If you have a garnishment, you only get as much of your income as the law allows. For a single person without children, that is currently 1,029.99 dollars net. Any dollars in excess of this amount will be retained for debt repayment. Those who want a loan despite the attachment in these circumstances must face difficulties.
The loan despite attachment
Garnishments are more than a bad starting point for a loan despite the attachment. Many debtors want a loan so that they can pay their debts. But from the aspect of garnishment, banks are waving away. Talking to debt counseling is more important than a loan. This can cause a debt settlement plan to be drawn up.
The bank behaves so negatively despite the attachment, as existing creditors give the bank no realistic prospect of attaching in the event of a loan default. The options are tightly knit to get a loan. If only one partner is affected by the attachment in the case of couples or spouses, the other person with a good credit rating can apply for a loan. The bank only requires a joint signature from married people.
The employees will try to put the right relationship between income and entitlement in the right order. This may include smaller installments but also amounts that can be deferred for an indefinite period. If you think that you can pay off your debts with another loan, you are doing wrong, especially with regard to a loan despite attachment. If a loan is nevertheless required, it can only be approved with collateral. Think of a surety here. It should be borne in mind that it is always a delicate matter to burden others with their financial problems. This requires a high level of trust.
If a guarantor is named, the guarantor must expect that extensive claims and outstanding liabilities will pass to the guarantor. This should never happen, because your own credit rating should always have priority. If a loan is actually sought further, the house bank has no understanding of the customer’s situation. However, there are already service providers who also approve a loan despite attachment of wages. It should be said that these providers take advantage of the poor financial situation of the customer and charge a loan with horrendous interest. It remains to be seen whether the loan seeker can use this to solve his financial problems.
The Swiss loan as a solution?
The loan seeker can contact a foreign bank that does not query Credit Bureau. These loans are secured against sufficient and regular income. The income must show an attachable portion. Since these banks do not query Credit Bureau, they in turn demand a higher income. However, no garnishment of wages may exist. The customer cannot keep silent because the bank requests proof of salary and bank statements, where the attachment is noted. This leads to a rejection.
In addition, the so-called Swiss loan has only small amounts of credit. In most cases, no more than 3,500 dollars are approved. The bank does not see Credit Bureau, but the Swiss ZEK is very well recognized. There it is noted whether the customer uses other foreign credits. The public debt register is also questioned. This directory lists the serious features, such as a garnishment of wages. This is also a reason for excluding a loan despite attachment.
Salaried employees often do not receive a monthly statement, so an annual earnings certificate could be presented, which often does not indicate the attachment. However, this can be viewed as fraud, at the latest when the customer can no longer pay the loan and the foreign bank wants to attach the loan. If a credit broker participates in such a case, who often broker these Credit Bureau-free loans, he can make himself punishable and be legally prosecuted. An extremely delicate thing that everyone decides for himself.
Alternatives to credit despite attachment
If these options have not been successful on a loan despite attachment, a loan can be requested from private investors. There are special portals where the loan seeker can credibly present his or her loan request. In addition, he should describe his special situation, not to hide anything, because these donors will also query Credit Bureau. If a loan should nevertheless come about, the interest will be high. In such a case, consideration should again be given to whether a loan should be taken out in such a situation.
In many cases, the creditor is a bank and offers a debt rescheduling loan. Then, in a clarifying discussion, all liabilities should be collected and combined to form a loan. If the bank sees the possibility that this debt restructuring can bring the borrower back into order in his finances, the loan could be successful despite the attachment. However, the other requirements must be right. The customer must have a permanent job, which should not be temporary.
Many employers fire their workers when garnishment is due. Think of an accountant here who is struggling with a garnishment. It can become a security risk for its employer. If the borrower keeps his job and receives his income every month, which is freely available again after payment of the seizure costs, the bank could approve a loan. However, the rates at the available overdraft facility should then be removed. He too can become an unconditional debt trap.
If there is no lender and the attachment cannot be ended, but the customer urgently needs cash, he could try to get money in a pawnshop. If high-quality items such as jewelry or media devices are available, they could be pawned in the pawnshop. The items are valued on site and the customer receives a real price for the items. The pawnbroker does not ask about creditworthiness and Credit Bureau and pays the customer the money in cash. This type of fundraising is being used more and more for a short-term financial shortage.